Defined contribution plan

Industry & Regulatory News

Protecting America’s Retirement Security Act Approved by Committee

The House Committee on Education and Labor approved by a 29-21 party line vote to release the Protecting America’s Retirement Security Act without amendments to the House floor for consideration. The bill contains the following retirement plan proposals.

  • Requires the Department of Labor, within two years of enactment, to explore how disclosure requirements for participant directed individual account plans can be improved to enhance participants’ understanding of fees and expenses and their cumulative effect on savings over time
  • Amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and the Internal Revenue Code to require spousal consent and notarization for all distributions, with certain exceptions
  • Amends ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code to require eligible employees who are not participating in the plan to be re-enrolled at least every 3 years for any automatic contribution arrangement that becomes effective after December 31, 2024
April 06 2022

Industry & Regulatory News

Protecting America’s Retirement Security Act Introduced in House

Representative Lucy McBath (D-GA) and five other Democratic co-sponsors have introduced the Protecting America’s Retirement Security Act in the House of Representatives. The bill proposes fee disclosure improvements, increasing spousal protections, and automatic reenrollment for defined contributions plans. Additionally, the bill would direct the creation of a personal finance education portal as well as a rainy-day refund savings program that would allow taxpayers to elect deferment of 20 percent of their tax refund to an interest-bearing account that would be available for distribution at a later date.

April 01 2022

Industry & Regulatory News

House Passes Retirement Reform Proposal

The House of Representatives has passed the Securing a Strong Retirement Act of 2022 (which lawmakers are coining SECURE 2.0) by a 414-5 vote. H.R. 2954 was first introduced by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal (D-MA) and Ranking Member Kevin Brady (R-TX) in October 2020, and subsequently amended by the Ways and Means Committee last year. The bill now includes provisions from the Retirement Improvement and Savings Enhancement (RISE) Act that came out of the House Education and Labor Committee last November.

Several key provisions are highlighted below.

  • Requires automatic enrollment of eligible employees in 401(k) and 403(b) plans with certain exceptions and grandfathering provisions
  • Enhances the three-year small retirement plan start-up credit, with a maximum credit of 100 percent (vs. the current 50 percent) for employers with no more than 50 employees, and phasing out for employers that have between 51 and 100 employees
  • Provides a new credit for employer contributions to defined contribution plans of up to $1,000 per employee
  • Enhances the saver’s credit by replacing the three-tier formula with a single 50 percent credit percentage on contributions up to $2,000, with phase outs beginning at certain AGI thresholds
  • Increases the age for required minimum distributions (RMDs) from age 72 to age 73 in 2023, then age 74 in 2030, and finally age 75 in 2033
  • Increases the catch-up contribution limit for plan participants who have attained ages 62-64 to $10,000 ($5,000 for SIMPLE plans)
  • Clarifies pooled employer plan (PEP) trustee duties by indicating that any fiduciary of a pooled employer plan may be responsible for collecting contributions
  • Permits 403(b) plans to participate in multiple employer plan (MEP) arrangements, including PEPs
  • Reduces from three years to two years the period of service requirement for long-term, part-time workers, and disregards pre-2021 service for vesting purposes
  • Reduces excise tax from 50 percent to 25 percent for failures to take RMDs, and further reduces tax to 10 percent if an RMD from an IRA is corrected within a certain time frame
  • Establishes a national online “lost and found” database to connect individuals with unclaimed retirement account benefits
  • Increases the cash-out limit from $5,000 to $7,000
  • Requires defined contribution plan sponsors to provide paper benefit statements at least once annually, unless a participant elects otherwise
  • Allows employers to permit employees to elect Roth treatment of both employee and employer contributions to SIMPLE and SEP plans
  • Requires catch-up contributions made to a 401(k), 403(b), or 457(b) plan to be made on a Roth basis
  • Permits defined contribution plan sponsors to provide participants with the option of receiving match contributions on a Roth basis

Additional proposals include the following.

  • Requires the IRS to promote the saver’s credit
  • Permits 403(b) plans to invest in collective investment trusts
  • Provides for indexing of IRA catch-up contributions
  • Permits certain student loan repayments to qualify for employer retirement plan matching contributions
  • Allows a small employer joining a MEP or PEP arrangement to potentially claim a small plan start-up credit during the first three years of the MEP/PEP arrangement’s existence
  • Provides a new small employer tax credit for enhanced plan eligibility for military spouses
  • Permits immediate de minimis financial incentives, in addition to a matching contribution, to individuals for contributing to a retirement plan
  • Enhances options for correcting employee salary deferral errors
  • Defers tax for certain sales of employer stock to an employee stock ownership plan sponsored by an S Corporation
  • Expands securities treated as publicly traded in the case of employee stock ownership plans
  • Removes RMD barriers for life annuities by updating applicable actuarial test
  • Reforms qualifying longevity annuity contract rules by repealing 25 percent limit for premiums and addressing spousal survivor rights after a divorce
  • Directs agencies to review reporting and disclosure requirements and report to Congress
  • Exempts defined contribution plans from sending otherwise required notices to certain individuals who are eligible but do not participate in the plan
  • Expands failures eligible for self-correction under the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System
  • Eliminates “first day of the month” deferral election requirement for governmental 457(b) plans
  • Expands types of distributions that can be considered IRA qualified charitable distributions and excluded from income
  • Adds private sector firefighters to those qualified public safety employees eligible for distribution penalty exception at age 50
  • Excludes certain disability-related first responder retirement payments from income after retirement age
  • Clarifies the statute of limitations for taxes on prohibited transactions with regard to IRAs to include the date such return would have been due
  • Allows otherwise excludable employees from a defined contribution plan to be excluded from determination of whether top-heavy requirements are met
  • Limits repayment of qualified birth or adoption distributions to three years
  • Permits participants to self-certify that deemed hardship distribution conditions are met in certain circumstances
  • Permits participants who self-certify that they have experienced domestic abuse to withdraw the lesser of $10,000 or 50 percent of their account without being subject to the 10 percent early distribution penalty tax. The funds could be repaid to the plan over three years.
  • Makes changes to stock attribution rules under family attribution for coverage and nondiscrimination testing
  • Permits discretionary amendments that increase benefits to participants to be adopted by the due date of the employer’s tax return
  • Permits new 401(k) plans established after the end of the taxable year but before the employer’s tax filing date to receive elective deferrals up to the due date of the employee’s tax return for the initial year when they are sponsored by sole proprietors and single-member LLCs
  • Limits only the portion of an IRA used in a prohibited transaction to be treated as distributed, as opposed to current rules disqualifying and treating the entire IRA as distributed
  • Directs the DOL to review pension risk transfer interpretive bulletin relative to conditions for discharging defined benefit plan liabilities

The legislation also includes minor technical corrections to the SECURE Act. One such correction clarifies that defined benefit plan participants other than 5 percent owners who retire after the year they turn 70½ are entitled to actuarial adjustment for the period in which they do not receive distributions. Plan amendments would be required by the last day of the first plan year beginning on or after January 1, 2024 (2026 for governmental and collectively bargained plans), and would extend these new deadlines to the SECURE Act, CARES Act, and the Taxpayer Certainty and Disaster Tax Relief Act.

The bill will now head to the Senate for consideration. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) who chairs the Senate HELP committee indicated that she and ranking member Senator Burr intend to advance companion legislation later in the spring.

March 30 2022

Industry & Regulatory News

IRS Issues Proposed MEP Rule

The IRS has released a new proposed rule providing for an exception, if certain requirements are met, to the application of the “unified plan rule” for multiple employer plans (MEPs) when there is a failure by one or more participating employers to take actions necessary to satisfy requirements of the Internal Revenue Code. The unified plan rule (also referred to as “one bad apple rule”) specifies that the failure by one participating employer to satisfy an applicable qualification requirement would result in the disqualification of the MEP for all employers maintaining the plan. The release also withdraws prior proposed regulations that were published in the Federal Register on July 3, 2019.

The Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act of 2019 (SECURE Act) created a statutory exception to the unified plan rule for certain types of MEPs and directed the Secretary to issue guidance to carry out that provision. The exception applies to defined contribution plans maintained by employers that have a “common interest” or have a “pooled plan provider” and failed to take action required to meet qualification requirements, subject to the following conditions.

  • The plan assets attributable to employees of the employer that failed to take action will be transferred to a plan maintained only by that employer
  • The employer (and not the plan or any other employer in the plan) will generally be responsible for liabilities with respect to the plan attributable to employees of that employer
  • The pooled plan provider performs substantially all of the administrative duties for which it is responsible for any plan year

The proposed regulations provide that the terms of the MEP document must include language describing the procedures that will be followed to address a participating employer failure, including a description of the notices that the plan administrator will send and when such notices will be sent. The plan terms must also describe the actions that the plan administrator will take if by the end of the 60-day period following the date the final notice is provided, the unresponsive participating employer does not take appropriate action with respect to the failure or initiate a spinoff to a separate plan maintained by the employer. The IRS intends to publish model language for this purpose in connection with a final rule.

Under the proposal, a MEP plan administrator may be required to provide up to three notices to an unresponsive participating employer regarding a failure—with the final notice also being provided to affected participants and the Department of Labor. The unresponsive participating employer can either take appropriate remedial action or initiate a spinoff. The proposal delineates notice requirements for both “a failure to provide information” and a “failure to take action”, and in situations where a failure by a participating employer is initially a failure to provide information, but becomes a failure to take action, more than three notices may be necessary.

If an unresponsive participating employer neither takes appropriate action or initiates a spinoff within 60 days after the final notice is provided, the MEP plan administrator must 1) stop accepting contributions from the unresponsive participating employer and participants, 2) provide notice to affected participants of the unresponsive participating employer, and 3) provide participants with an election regarding treatment of their accounts.

Comments may be submitted within 60 days of publication in the Federal Register. A public hearing on the proposed rule has been scheduled for Wednesday, June 22.

March 25 2022

Industry & Regulatory News

Long-Term Care Affordability Act Introduced

Representative Ann Wagner (R-MO) has introduced the Long-Term Care Affordability Act to allow distributions from retirement accounts for the payment of long-term care insurance coverage. The bill is the House companion to S.2415 introduced in the Senate by Senator Patrick Toomey (R-PA) last year.

The proposal would permit tax-free retirement saving distributions of up to $2,500 per year—indexed for inflation—that are used to purchase long-term care insurance. The arrangements to which the legislation applies would include qualified retirement plans, 403(a) and 403(b) plans, governmental 457(b) plans, and IRAs. These distributions would also be exempt from the 10 percent early distribution penalty tax. The bill would also create new distribution triggers for employee deferral amounts that have been contributed to 401(k), 403(b), and governmental 457(b) plans.

 

March 22 2022

Industry & Regulatory News

Enhancing Emergency and Retirement Savings Act Introduced in House

Representative Brad Wenstrup (R-OH) has introduced the Enhancing Emergency and Retirement Savings Act of 2022 to provide flexibility and access for those who experience unexpected emergencies. The bill is the House companion to S. 1870, introduced by Senator James Lankford (R-OK) and Senator Michael Bennet (D-CO) last year.

The legislation would provide a penalty-free “emergency personal expense distribution” option from employer-sponsored retirement plans and IRAs. The proposal would allow for one emergency distribution per calendar year of up to $1,000 from the individual’s total nonforfeitable accrued benefit under the plan. The bill requires that the withdrawn funds be paid back to the plan before an additional emergency distribution from that same plan is allowed. The amount can be recontributed within a three-year period to any eligible plan to which a rollover contribution can be made.

An emergency personal expense distribution is defined as a distribution for purposes of meeting unforeseeable or immediate financial need relating to necessary personal or family emergency expenses. The plan sponsor of an employer-sponsored retirement plan may rely on an employee’s certification that the conditions are satisfied in determining whether the distribution is an emergency distribution.

March 22 2022

Industry & Regulatory News

SEC Proposes ESG Reporting for Publicly Traded Companies

The SEC has issued a proposed rule that would require publicly traded companies to include certain climate-related disclosures in their registration statements and periodic reports, such as the annual Form 10-K.

The proposed rule would in part require disclosure about the following.

  • The registrant’s governance of climate-related risks and relevant risk management processes.
  • How any climate-related risks identified by the registrant have had or are likely to have a material impact on its business and consolidated financial statements.
  • How any identified climate-related risks have affected or are likely to affect the registrant’s strategy, business model, and outlook.
  • The impact of climate-related events (such as severe weather and other natural conditions) and transition activities on the line items of a registrant’s financial statements and estimates used in financial statements.

The rule would also require disclosures about direct greenhouse gas admissions and indirect emissions from purchased electricity or other forms of energy, as well as disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions from upstream and downstream activities in its value chain if material or if the registrant has set an emissions target. Accelerated filers would be required to include an attestation report from an independent attestation service provider covering emission disclosures.

A fact sheet provides an overview of requirements and the applicable phase-in period—depending on the type of registrant and type of emission disclosure required. The comment period will remain open for the longer of 1) 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, or 2) 60 days after the date of issuance and publication on sec.gov.

March 21 2022

Industry & Regulatory News

DOL Issues Proposed Rule on Prohibited Transaction Exemption Procedures

The Department of Labor (DOL) has released a proposal that would supersede the Department’s existing procedure governing applications for exemptions from the prohibited transaction provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and the Internal Revenue Code. The Secretary of Labor is authorized to grant such exemptions and provide procedures for relief. Highlights of the proposal suggest substantially stricter standards and additional criteria for obtaining prohibited transaction relief, if implemented.

The DOL emphasizes that it will apply a high level of scrutiny to any retroactive exemption—including ensuring that no participants were harmed—and suggests contacting the agency before engaging in the transaction. Any information provided to the Office of Exemption Determinations, including during the pre-submission process, becomes part of an administrative record that is open for public inspection.

The DOL states that a previously issued exemption is not determinative of whether a future exemption would be approved under the same fact pattern. The DOL also proposes additional requirements in the application for exemption, several of which are highlighted below.

  • The reason(s) for engaging in the exemption transaction
  • Any material benefit that a party involved in the exemption transaction may receive because of the transaction
  • The costs and benefits of the exemption transaction to the affected plan(s), participants, and beneficiaries—including quantification of those costs and benefits, if possible
  • A detailed statement that describes possible alternatives to the exemption transaction and why the applicant did not pursue those alternatives
  • A description of each conflict of interest or potential instance of self-dealing that would be permitted if the exemption is granted
  • A statement that the transaction will be in the best interest of the plan and its participants and beneficiaries
  • A statement that all compensation received, directly or indirectly, by a party involved in the exemption transaction will not exceed reasonable compensation within the meaning of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code
  • All statements made to the DOL, the plan, or, if applicable, the qualified independent fiduciary or qualified independent appraiser cannot be materially misleading at the time the statements are made
  • A statement whether any prior transactions have occurred between the plan or plan sponsor and a party involved in the exemption transaction

The proposal modifies the definition of a qualified independent appraiser. It also addresses contractual obligations, prohibits indemnifications, and requires detailed information regarding relationships with any party or its affiliates (including past engagements) in an effort to determine independence. Similarly, the proposal expands requirements of qualified independent fiduciaries by prohibiting indemnifications, requiring fiduciary liability insurance sufficient to cover damages resulting by a breach of the independent fiduciary, and certifying that the exemption transaction complies with impartial conduct standards and the independent fiduciary has no conflicts of interest that could affect their judgement.

Under the proposal, applicants would have a duty to promptly notify the DOL of any material changes to representations made during the application process or after approval of the exemption, including disclosing whether a participating party in the exemption is the subject of an investigation or enforcement action. The changes would apply 90 days following receipt of a final rule in the Federal Register. Comments on the proposed rule must be submitted to the DOL by April 14, 2022.

March 18 2022

Industry & Regulatory News

DOL Final Rule on SECURE Act Group of Plan Reporting at OMB

Final regulations entitled, Implement SECURE Act and Related Revisions to Employee Benefit Plan Annual Reporting on the Form 5500, issued by the Department of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA), have been received by the federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) provides final review of regulatory guidance before its official release.

The Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act included a provision that would allow employers sponsoring defined contribution plans that have the same trustee, administrator, fiduciaries, plan year, and investment options, to file one common Form 5500 beginning in 2022. Proposed guidance was issued last fall under a larger guidance package, with details shared in a Washington Pulse.

March 18 2022

Industry & Regulatory News

DOL Releases Proposed Rule Updating Davis-Bacon Regulations

The Department of Labor’s (DOL’s) Wage and Hour Division has released a proposed rule Updating the Davis-Bacon and Related Acts Regulations. The DOL indicates that the proposal is the most comprehensive review of the Davis-Bacon Act regulations in 40 years.

The Davis-Bacon Act generally requires payment of locally prevailing wages under direct federal contracts and for covered contractors and their subcontractors. The employer’s obligation can be met by paying the applicable prevailing wage entirely as cash wages or by a combination of cash wages and employer-provided bona fide fringe benefits—including pension and health benefits.

All comments must be received within 60 days of the rule being posted in the Federal Register. While the Wage and Hour Division solicits comments from across the construction industry, it encourages all stakeholders to participate in the process.

March 14 2022